Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy and robotic surgery in the treatment of mediastinal tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Comparing the clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy and robotic surgery in the treatment of mediastinal tumors using meta-analysis. METHODS: Computer retrieval of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for literature comparing the clinical effects of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in treating mediastinal tumors, with the retrieval time limit from the establishment of the database to September 2023. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: A total of 19 articles were included, with a total of 3517 patients. The results of the Meta-analysis showed that the RATS group had less intraoperative bleeding [MD = - 5.20, 95%CI (- 9.28, - 1.12), P = 0.01], lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy [OR = 0.41, 95%CI (0.23, 0.72), P = 0.002], lower rate of total postoperative complications [OR = 0.57, 95%CI (0.34, 0.95), P = 0.03], shorter postoperative drainage time [MD = - 0.72, 95%CI (- 1.13, - 0.32), P = 0.0004], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [MD = - 0.90, 95%CI (- 1.16, - 0.65), P < 0.001], in comparison with the VATS group. There was an insignificant difference between the two groups in terms of tumor size [MD = - 0.02, 95%CI (- 0.33, 0.30), P = 0.91] and operation time [MD = 0.17, 95%CI (- 7.61, 7.94), P = 0.97]. However, in regards to hospitalization costs [MD = 2634.75, 95%CI (991.62, 4277.88), P = 0.002], the RATS group was more expensive than the VATS group. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted mediastinal tumor resection surgery has more advantages in terms of intraoperative bleeding, conversion to thoracotomy rate, total postoperative complication rate, postoperative drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay, in comparison with thoracoscopic-assisted mediastinal tumor resection surgery. There is an insignificant difference in tumor size and operation time between the two surgeries. However, robot-assisted mediastinal tumor resection surgery increases hospitalization costs.

Effect of Weight-Adjusted Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine, and Metaraminol for Elective Cesarean Delivery on Neonatal Acid-Base Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Many previous trials have compared the effects of different vasoactive drugs on cesarean section patients, but their infusion rate is based on experience rather than high-quality evidence. It is difficult to judge whether the effect of vasoactive drug comes from the better choice or a more appropriate at rates of vasoactive drugs. The effect of vasoactive drugs at the rates of the 90% effective dose needs to be verified and compared. Patients and Methods: Women undergoing elective caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were randomized to receive phenylephrine or norepinephrine or metaraminol infusion at the rate that was assumed to be the 90% effective dose. Anesthetic management was standardized and included fluid loading with 10 mL/kg of Ringer. The primary outcome was the umbilical artery pH. Results: 78 patients were included. The umbilical artery pH was not significantly different among the three groups (phenylephrine group: 7.33 ± 0.03 vs norepinephrine group: 7.33 ± 0.04 vs metaraminol group: 7.33 ± 0.04, P = 0.99). There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and nausea and vomiting among the three groups. The SBP of the phenylephrine group was significantly higher than that of the metaraminol group (adjustive P value = 0.005). Conclusion: Phenylephrine (0.54 µg/kg/min) or metaraminol (2 µg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (0.08 µg/kg/min) administered to healthy patients with elective cesarean section after spinal anesthesia has no significant effect on the acid-base balance of the fetus.